Mathoma’s channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCL_l…
Eric’s not a Christian, currently a seeker, but sick of Atheist crap. He’s also a volunteer on our Facebook group. Come get to know him!
Books and videos: Dr. Gordon Stein (Athiest) vs Dr Greg Bahnsen (Jesus follower) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anGAa…
An Introduction to the New Testament: https://smile.amazon.com/Introduction…
An Introduction to the Old Testament https://smile.amazon.com/Introduction…
How to Persuade a Christian to Become An Atheist http://www.wikihow.com/Persuade-a-Chr…
Please support our work via Paypal or Bitcoin or Patreon. Atheists make a lot of claims on science, but what’s so funny about it is how few scientists will back up many of the claims they make, and how few scientists are actually Atheists. Indeed, Atheists are a minority among scientists even in places like China, where Atheism is rigorously enforced by the government, and most Nobel laureates in fields like Physics are Christians even today, with a good representation from believing practicing Jews and some other religions. And that’s because belief in God is rational and useful in a field like Physics, and is well-evidenced!
Tune in for this off-the cuff discussion!
Scientists and Belief
No really, even around the world, Scientists are NOT majority Atheist.
Nobel Laureates in Physics:
Georges LeMaitre, the formulator of the Big Bang
The Cosmological Constant
Oxford Science & Math Professor John Lennox trashes Lawrence Krauss’s “Something from Nothing”
Elon Musk and the Digital Universe Theory
Astrophysicist Sarah Salviander:
Molecular Biologist from Freedom from Atheism Foundation:
Biochemist Sy Garte:
Lynn Margulis page on Amazon:
Lynn Margulis destroys Richard Dawkins and “Selfish Gene” at Oxford:
Atheism is no longer just the average person who decides they don’t believe in God or don’t find the evidence for God they’ve seen so far convincing. It is now an ideological hate movement and cult ideology, rooted originally in Marxist thought but now embraced by many libertarians and “conservative” right-wingers. The cult gets by by simply lying about the evidence wherever the find it.
In reality we have evidence in multiple fields in science. So to kick off an ongoing series we’re dubbing “Atheists Always Lie,” we will look at just one of the areas where we have evidence for God in contemporary mainstream science: Near Death Experience.
Let us know your thoughts and share your suggestions!
Bertrand Russell was a famous Atheist, who gave us “Russell’s Teapot” and “Why I Am Not A Christian.” Today Max and Todd from Praise of Folly take apart an overrated “rationalist.” Please also subscribe to Todd’s “Praise of Folly” channel for more interesting interviews! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh9m… Bertrand Russell’s essay: https://users.drew.edu/~jlenz/whynot….
Yes this fella says he’s a real live Witch, and is in no way affiliated with Wicca, which he says is feminist bunk. He has some choice words for Manospherians talking about Evolutionary Psychology too!
He recommends these books to understand his faith:
“The Witch-cult in Western Europe: A Study in Anthropology” by Dr. Margaret Murray and ” “The Tarim Mummies” by JP Mallory and Victor H. Mair
Jordon Peterson discusses why it’s easy to bash Christianity and why it doesn’t make you smart. Lively discussion of preserving not well explained heritage is important, the possible escaping the responsibilities that Christian lays on people, the meaning of sacrifice ancient and modern. He segues into the idea that idea of personal sacrifice to a benevolent God is a frightening concept. He finishes by saying the bashing of Christianity at the level of universities is a terrible thing. The level of cynicism is completely anti-humanity. Segement is about 10 minutes long and video starts at close to the beginning.
Def 1: A contingent being is a being such that if it exists, could have not-existed or could cease to exist.
Def 2: A necessary being (or non-contingent being) is a being such that if it exists, cannot not-exist (and therefore could not not-have-existed and cannot cease to exist).
Note: I use ground-reason essentially to do the work of the German Grund, a word which neither the English “ground” nor “reason” sufficiently captures in meaning, since it unites the sides of being and knowing, the ontological and the epistemological, in one.
1. A contingent being C exists.