In this installment we talk about physics and astronomy, Protestant Catholic and Jewish scientists, history, other areas of science, the peer review system, and a very surprising connection to the book of Genesis and our estimated 14 billion year old universe.
The Case for the Soul (Playlist: Please note, in ALL these videos peer reviewed references are provided in the lowbar and also we can provide MORE references than these): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBsI_…
Dr. Jeffrey Long – God and the Afterlife. (Please NOTE! You do not get to run off to your favorite “debunker” and simply cast aspersions on this. This is peer reviewed data, with link in the lowbar. This is a researcher who ALSO describes how ideological Atheists DO NOT address the evidence and are often dishonest about it): https://youtu.be/SyhZV-LGtJ8
Rupert sheldrake – The Physics of Angels (Note: Sheldrake is a real scientist who’s published quite a bit of solid peer reviewed papers on a number of topics. You do not get to dismiss him by saying He’s Not Atheist Therefore He’s Not Reliable.): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ymz5g…
Religion-hating Atheists who said “religion is an outdated superstition” and “against science” and “science has proven we have no need for God” and “religion is holding us back as a species” murdered many. Granarkadis, a Russian Orthodox, has a story. Max chimes in.
Sargon, Vee Monroe, Louis le Vau, Rags, King Crocaduck, and others are going to set the new ideological agenda for all the “Free Thinking” Atheists. What they won’t answer is why anyone should care what they think or care what they want or trust anything they have to say. Also, we’ll examine why these guys are so painfully lost.
Sargon, you have made numerous false statements about me and my team, and have refused to acknowledge or correct your errors. Some of your statements about me are likely actionable in UK libel court and I would suggest to you that there’s a point where you can no longer call yourself “liberal” when you routinely smear and distort and wreck the reputations of people you don’t even bother talking to. I think you’re no different at all in this regard from a Steve Shives or an Anita Sarkeesian: you bash people, you spread false narratives out of ignorance, and you do your best to smear, malign, and distort your critics, without ever being willing to talk to them face to face or be confronted on your own ideas by your critics. If it’s all a misunderstanding, I invite you to bring the Red Pill Religion team onto a stream to talk about who I really am, who this team of people is, and what we’re really about. We’re not all Catholic, we’re not all even Christian, and we talk all the time with people, including honorable, decent Atheists, like Coach Red Pill, Academic Agent, Keith Preston, and a ton of other pretty cool Atheists. Before I turn the floor over to these young men–they’re all younger than you I believe–let me note that they’re not all American and not all Catholic. And I know a number of British religious people, none could be here but I can arrange for that as well. The truth is, sir, you DO NOT live in an Atheist country. You in fact live in a country full of religious people, and the religious are rising not falling. Including Christianity, which is undergoing a revival in your own country. The question you therefore need to answer is this: If you truly are a liberal sir, how do you plan on getting along with religious people? Because most of us aren’t particularly interested in being degraded and maligned by you. And degrading and maligning us is the OPPOSITE of liberal, tolerant, and inclusive. So, as Dave the Distributist has asked (and you’ve ignored): WHEN will you grow up enough to TALK TO PEOPLE WHO THINK DIFFERENT FROM YOU SIR? I will ask it again: how can you POSSIBLY consider yourself an open-minded liberal and REFUSE to talk to people you criticize and REFUSE to be confronted on your own beliefs? How ARE you different from Steve Shives or Laci Green or Anita Sarkeesian sir? Except that you’re anti- instead of pro-feminist, how are you truly different? You do EVERYTHING you accuse them of. Or you seem to. When will that change? With that I’ll turn it over to the crowd, and I’ll be back to wrap this up. –Max
Postmodernism and Deconstruction have been all the academic rage for the last few decades and they’ve taken their toll, as “intellectuals” tear apart every idea and every fact and even the idea of a fact until they’ve obliterated everything to gibberish and stupidity. What are the roots of this intellectual trend?