Molecular Biologist & Former Atheist of Freedom from Atheism Foundation

In the face of professional harassment and threats, many scientists are afraid to say they’re Christians out loud. Join a Molecular Biologist from

Freedom from Atheism Foundation as he speaks of his own leaving of the Atheist fold. Freedom from Atheism Foundation https://www.facebook.com/FFAF.Interna…

Max & Astrophysicist Sarah Salviander: Theology & Black Holes

Raised Atheist in Canada, Astrophysicist Sarah Salviander found God while studying science. She’s hardly unique. Join us as we talk to her about her journey!

Sarah’s Blog: https://sixdayscience.com/

The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom https://smile.amazon.com/Science-God-…

Biochemist Sy Garte & Max Raised Atheist Found God Studying Science

Biochemist Sy Garte was raised to be atheist by his parents—and found God while studying science.

The Book of Works by Sy Garte https://thebookofworks.com/ Commies: A Journey Through the Old Left, the New Left and the Leftover Left by Ronald Radosh https://smile.amazon.com/Commies-Jour… Radical Son by David Horowitz https://smile.amazon.com/Radical-Son-…

#RedPillReligion: John C. Wright Attempts To “Deconvert” Max

John C. Wright used to be a Proselytizing Atheist, and tonight, he puts on his old toolbelt and attempts to convince Max that Atheism is rational and religion is false!

John C. Wright: http://www.scifiwright.com/

L. Jagi Lamplighter (Mrs. Wright) http://www.ljagilamplighter.com/

Why Does Anybody Care About Richard Carrier’s Sex Life?

Every once in a while in our adventures in Atheistland–which is not the only topic we talk about on Red Pill Religion but it is a perennial favorite–we run into another story about pseudohistorian Richard Carrier’s supposed evil nature as a creepy sex predator. Or, about how he’s supposedly being defamed for petty jealous reasons with false allegations.

Honestly? I have NEVER been interested much one way or the other with Carrier’s sexual pecadillos, because he’s from Professional Atheistland, and in Professional Atheistland, the men and women are all either:

1) Sexless desperate nerds with no social skills. They are often highly unattractive but mostly on purpose. Note the On-Purpose part: they’re virtually all afflicted with poor self-image and self-loathing.

2) Some “sophisticated” variety of “polyamoury,” which is what in the old days we used to call “swingers.”

I’m quite certain Richard Carrier’s been very sexually promiscuous, in ways a lot of people would find gross or unhealthy. Also, he lies brazenly about history for a living, so he would obviously lie about anything else, too. Including whether or not he had “consent” to do whatever he did. Or whether he says he or didn’t do.

Liars lie, after all.

But this is Professional Atheistland, and the women in Professional Atheistland are women attracted to manipulative narcissists. Women are rare in Professional Atheistland, but they are all also either desperately unattractive and unhappy loners desperate for validation, OR, “sophisticated” swingers. They take pride in their “open-minded” sexuality and multiple partners. Liars lie, and “regret rape” and “rape allegations for revenge” are real things that women who don’t have any morals and ethics will use.

To be honest, if you’re in a room full of people who do nothing but obsess about sex and open-mindedness about it, and take pride in their many sexual adventures, “consent” become a meaningless concept.

In short, I don’t know what happened, because these people are all into wild crazy sex. They just help prove that “consent” isn’t really a coherent concept legally or morally when it comes to sex. If anyone consented to anything, it was when they walked into a room full of sex-obsessed neurotic ideologues in a bizarre hate cult.

How about we go back to a notion that promiscuous sex is neither healthy, brave, admirable, or even attractive. Indeed, isn’t good for anyone involved let alone society as a whole. How about we start respecting that “monogamy” is actually natural in humans (much much well-established science shows) and socially desirable.

And that promiscuity is neither brave nor admirable. Besides the sexual diseases and unloved or aborted children it brings, it also eventually brings about confusion and recrimination and more.

Richard Carrier lives in a land where everybody’s most important value is being “not judgemental” about sex, but being judgemental about everything else. Except that people with no morals usually turn on each other.

Why Are Most of Red Pill Religion Team Anonymous? Freedom From Atheism Foundation.

One of our favorite outfits on the Internet is the Freedom From Atheism Foundation. We happen to know some of the principals behind it–more than 6 years ago they started and they received countless death threats, character assassination, attempts at professional smearing, and more. They have a Wall of Atheist Hate on their Facebook page, filled with examples of things we saw when we started this project three years ago.

We’ve seen all of this and more on Red Pill Religion, which is why those of us who can stay anonymous, do.

The good news is the tide is slowly turning. The Freedom from Atheism Foundation is probably more popular than the militant ideologues of the Freedom from Religion Foundation, for example.

Atheist groups tend to be funded by wealthy donors. Groups who oppose the hateful “Atheist” political and cult groups, like FFAF or Red Pill Religion or others, run entirely on grassroots volunteer labor and support.

By the way we could use your financial support. Find the links to our Patreon, Paypal, and Bitcoin on the right sidebar of this site.

Rant About Atheist Dogma

I restate that the Intelligence who both created and sustains the universe is real and necessary.

God necessarily exists outside of our universe of energy, time, space and matter. Those qualities are contingent and rely on outside forces to bring them into existence. The Big Bang occurred 13-14 billion years ago. That is when all four of those phenomenas came into being. Nevertheless there was God who is without beginning or end because He exists outside of time.

Finite beings trapped inside the laws of physics cannot truly comprehend how there actually was the divine intellect (actualized existence) prior to the existence of the infinite universe.
An analogy might be to use the Digital Universe Theory, which states that the universe is a digital simulation. In this case, God is both the programmer and architecture of the hardware of the simulation.

Some Atheists claim that if something is not provable by their ‘god’ Empirical science, it cannot exist. When this assertion is made or someone rejects the idea of free will, God, or any other ‘intangible’ or ‘abstract, they must necessarily reject all such concepts.
The laws of mathematics, physics, gravity and all other natural laws are used to measure or calculate, but are themselves unmeasurable. Why do the atheists not reject these things? Would that be inconvenient to their ’cause’? The concept of ‘good’ and ‘evil’ belongs solely to religion. The West was built by the Judeo-Christian concepts of charity, cooperation, selflessness and the belief that the whole of reality reflects The Creator.

Believing that studying nature will guide the observer to God, Christianity was the spearhead of science. The dedication of the monks and nuns preserved knowledge and learning through the thousand-plus years between the fall of Rome and the Renaissance. With very few exceptions (beginning in the 19th Century) every scientist of note was and is religious. They are also mostly Christian.

Atheists condemn all religion, everywhere and for all time, by citing the abhorrent behaviors of only a few people who claimed to be religious, yet acted in direct contradiction to the values and teachings of their faith. At the same time, they hold all atheists innocent of the verifiable, catastrophic slaughters of 200 million-plus by people who loudly, proudly claimed their atheism.

Rather they cite the religious education from the people’s youth. Somehow the atheists of today can repudiate their religious upbringing and be ‘true atheists’ while the atheists responsible for mass slaughter were unable to do so. It may be that no one screamed ‘Atheism” as they loosed the bullet or blade that killed, the ideology that demanded and justified the dehumanization and industrial -scale slaughter REQUIRED Atheism because the absence of God and religious morality.

Despite their claims to the contrary, Good without God is fallacious. The abolition of God must necessarily abolish all laws based upon God’s decrees. Just as Catholicism built the foundation and culture of Western Science, it built it’s Civilization and culture. That includes each and every law and cultural expectations. Atheist cultures have produces no uplifting or entrancingly beautiful art, music, poems or prose.

Atheism demands absolute obedience to the ideology of itself and anything built upon it. Art of any type demands freedom. Humans feel repressed and angry under totalitarianism, because we were built for more. We were built for Theism and God; the ubiquitousness of theism throughout the world proves it. Few were Christian to begin with. but Christianity (non-violently for the most part) peacefully conquered the pagan world with the message of God’s forgiveness and love.